Amount:

Kelly Brook as wonder women

20 Jan 2016 18:32 #46130 by fats
Kelly Brook as wonder women was created by fats
Hi all,

No words are needed just lookat the pics

This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Dru1076

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • fats
  • fats's Avatar Topic Author
  • Online
  • SWM - Administrator
  • SWM - Administrator
More
20 Jan 2016 19:49 #46133 by shadar
Replied by shadar on topic Kelly Brook as wonder women
Too soft for WW.

If Gal is too skinny, Kelly is too soft and flesh looking. WW should have hard, toned muscle, even if she doesn't have enough of it. She needs to look like she's been training as a warrior for decades.

Gal might qualify in the toned category based on the Preview.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jan 2016 21:42 - 20 Jan 2016 23:50 #46135 by Dru1076
Replied by Dru1076 on topic Kelly Brook as wonder women
I'm with Fats on this one. With a golden age wonder woman in mind, Kelly looks almost perfect. And that outfit looks like Golden Age WW to my amatuer eye.
.

"Stupid Reality!" - Homer J. Simpson
Last edit: 20 Jan 2016 23:50 by Dru1076.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jan 2016 23:55 - 20 Jan 2016 23:55 #46138 by kikass2014
Replied by kikass2014 on topic Kelly Brook as wonder women
I gotta agree, I think she has the beauty and body for WW (though not sure about the height, don't really remember Kelly being that tall). Tbh I'm not in the camp of WW having to be a muscle-bound amazonian, but she should at least have a woman's figure.

And Kelly Brook certainly has that.

Peace.

/K
Last edit: 20 Jan 2016 23:55 by kikass2014. Reason: Typo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jan 2016 15:45 #46144 by Newshound
Replied by Newshound on topic Kelly Brook as wonder women
I definitely prefer Kelly over the skinny chick.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds