Amount

WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers

10 Jun 2017 02:21 #54631 by shadar

castor wrote: Heres one of the things about Wonder Woman

....

Which i think comes to the question: is this your idea of what Wonder Woman should be? maybe not.

.


I think the WW version that Jenkins/Gadot and the writers created was almost perfect for me. I've always perceived WW as more human-like than hardcore Amazon, least of all a demi-god. I was influenced by the TV show long ago. Yes, she can kick ass when she wants to, but in the other 99% of her life, she's warm, funny, friendly and compassionate, yet focused and very much awake. The best friend anyone could have Diana is a very special and memorable woman because she can project all these traits at the same time, independent of her WW side.

And yes, she's trained to be the greatest warrior of all time, with the power a goddess, Superman's equal in a fight, but that's not what she lives for.

Anyway, that's what the movie WW suggests to me.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Markiehoe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shadar
  • shadar's Avatar
  • Away
  • Uberposter par Excellence
  • Uberposter par Excellence
More
10 Jun 2017 04:09 - 10 Jun 2017 04:13 #54636 by lowerbase
Replied by lowerbase on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
Engineered-Sorcery wrote:
One was they way they killed Steve off. While I understand it had to be done, the sacrifice was senseless and seemed to only be used to make Diana seem more tragic as a character. They were established to have dynamite, as well as what seemed to be other sorts of explosives, and asking for a stick or bundle which he could light and bail from the plane would have been a far smarter decision than running off to shoot one of the gas tanks.

I think it was okay, not the most clever sacrifice, but I think it worked on multiple levels. It gives her humility, a frail mortal doing something she can't do -to fly-, and saving more lives than superman. It established her whole moral compass (as well as for the audience)

The muted scene where he gives his watch was so freaking emotional. It was brilliant. I only don't know where she kept the watch safe while fighting with another god. Between her breasts?

my biggest fear is that the studio will try to 'resurrect' him. It would be so fucking stupid.

But we know what happens with all the dearest characters in comics and scifi... Spock, Starbucks, and most Supersomethings that died one way or another, and like Jesus they are back.
Last edit: 10 Jun 2017 04:13 by lowerbase.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jun 2017 04:56 #54638 by TwiceOnThursdays
Replied by TwiceOnThursdays on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
Jenkins does a Reddit AMA: www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/6gc5mp/..._monster_and_wonder/

The Steve Trevor 'average' thing was ad libbed by Chris Pine.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jun 2017 08:03 #54639 by slim36
Was the putting the movie into WWI but also having a Dunkirk evacuation - was it just a promo for the coming Dunkirk movie? Or did they feel having the WW II villain might be too dark?
For me it was probably more interesting since I know less about WWI

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jun 2017 09:56 #54641 by Markiehoe
Replied by Markiehoe on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers

slim36 wrote: Was the putting the movie into WWI but also having a Dunkirk evacuation - was it just a promo for the coming Dunkirk movie? Or did they feel having the WW II villain might be too dark?
For me it was probably more interesting since I know less about WWI


I believe the W.W.I. setting was mostly done to separate her origin from Captain America.

However as others have noted does she sit out W.W.II?
Surely she would have fought and history would have recorded her actions.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2017 04:45 #54667 by grungykitten
Replied by grungykitten on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
I guess I'm the only one here who left the auditorium feeling non-plussed. To be clear, I don't think it's a bad movie, but given the hype and the stellar reviews, I was hoping for something more.

I should be happy with it. The performances are excellent; Gadot and Pine have fantastic chemistry on screen. The action scenes are up there with the best this genre has to offer. But for me, it's all let down by the utterly formulaic, ham-fisted writing. Making the entire movie a flash-back sequence... shoving ten minutes of campy exposition in at the start... the shoehorned comedic interludes... the sexual tension, and then the deus-ex-machina videogame ending. It's like they were just checking items off a list.

Look, I get it. Marvel has set the superhero-movie template, and now everyone feels they must follow it. I can't exactly argue with the stellar box-office numbers this movie is doing. And I don't regret having spent $16 on this movie. But when I leave a Marvel movie, I'm replaying scenes from it in my head for the next couple of days. With this, I'm not. It's just so depressingly mediocre.

I might go watch the 2009 animated movie again. Even that had a better story than this.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Jun 2017 00:53 #54679 by demethon

Woodclaw wrote: As far as I'm concerned Wonder Woman has a good first act, a great second act and terribly weak third act.

This. A thousand times, yes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Jun 2017 01:31 - 12 Jun 2017 01:40 #54680 by kikass2014
Replied by kikass2014 on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
Hmm... How to review Wonder Woman?

I'll say that from an "ubergirl" perspective, the movie was great. Wonder Woman rocked in those scenes for sure. As a fan of this genre, I was not disappointed in the slightest in this regard.

As a movie, I have to say, it was actually pretty good. Certainly the best by a MILE that has come from the DC stable.

Have to agree with some of the others here, good first act, great second act and very weak final act, is a good way of putting it.

The first act felt very exposition-ary, but that's ok since its an origin tale. The second act was great, with some really nice set pieces. The reveal in the trenches is probably the best scene in the film tbh, visually and also thematically. And if the film had ended with the liberation of the village, it would have worked a whole lot better.

I especially liked the way they got Diana into the bell tower, calling back to what Steve and Diana saw on the beach. Its little things like this I enjoy the most in movies, set-ups and pay-offs.

Unfortunately, the film is let down by a visual mess of a third act, and also a slightly non-nonsensical one. As others have said, where was she in WWII (among other things)? And David Thewlis was fine as the crusty English guy, whispering his machinations, but when he was Ares it just didn't work. He seemed to be forcing the lines out, shouting them rather then delivering them, which seemed a bit jarring.

Kudos to Jenkins and the team for getting the best out of Gadot. Her acting sucks, but they did something really clever in that they actually crafted the character based on her talent. Gadot LOOKS great, she is a very attractive woman, but she is no actress. So they shifted a lot of the heavy stuff to Chris Pine. He carried the majority of the film imo and its more a Steve Trevor film then Wonder Woman if I'm honest. On top of that, they also surrounded her with three other characters, creating a Howling Commandos crew and vibe.

And it worked.

They turned Wonder Woman into Captain America lol

This was more or less CA:The First Avenger but female version.

But hey, it worked.

I was entertained by it for the most part.

Sure its not the story I would have chosen to write for Wonder Woman, but it is what it is. And in the main, it didn't suck. So thumbs up there.

A problem I can see coming is how do they move forward. I mean, sure the "fish out of water", naive Diana, Gadot seems to sell well. But when you transplant that into the modern era, hmm, how well will that work? I guess only time will tell.

Is it the best superhero film ever? No. Is it as good as the hype suggest? Certainly not.

But, well done DC. You shuffled the deck and you actually have a decent film. Keep it up...oh wait Justice League is coming, doh! :p

Just my 2-cents.

Peace.

/K

P.S. I have to say, Robin Wright looked pretty buff as Antiope, and is a fine actress to boot. I would love to have seen her as Wonder Woman.
Last edit: 12 Jun 2017 01:40 by kikass2014.
The following user(s) said Thank You: shadar, Markiehoe, Monty, LustMonster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Jun 2017 16:49 - 12 Jun 2017 16:55 #54694 by shadar
After hearing someone on Fox claiming that Wonder Woman sucked because she didn't have enough American stars on her costume, I decided to take a journey down the left-hand fork of Wingnut Highway to see if I could find a review that was also unintentionally funny on the other side.

I found a doozy. The Wonder Woman is Propaganda. review. Written by a millennial feminist woman who writes with great skill, it's a display of the kind of absurd distortions that come when you see everything through ideologically tinted glasses -- in this case, very thick ones. But it does rank high in my Unintentionally Funny rankings, so I've decided to share it.

I seriously doubt if ANYONE on SWM shared ANY of this reviewer's thoughts during the movie, which makes it all the more unintentionally hilarious. Enjoy.

newrepublic.com/article/143100/wonder-woman-propaganda

Shadar
Last edit: 12 Jun 2017 16:55 by shadar.
The following user(s) said Thank You: kikass2014

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shadar
  • shadar's Avatar
  • Away
  • Uberposter par Excellence
  • Uberposter par Excellence
More
12 Jun 2017 19:24 #54696 by TwiceOnThursdays
Replied by TwiceOnThursdays on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers

shadar wrote: After hearing someone on Fox claiming that Wonder Woman sucked because she didn't have enough American stars on her costume, I decided to take a journey down the left-hand fork of Wingnut Highway to see if I could find a review that was also unintentionally funny on the other side.

I found a doozy. The Wonder Woman is Propaganda. review. Written by a millennial feminist woman who writes with great skill, it's a display of the kind of absurd distortions that come when you see everything through ideologically tinted glasses -- in this case, very thick ones. But it does rank high in my Unintentionally Funny rankings, so I've decided to share it.

I seriously doubt if ANYONE on SWM shared ANY of this reviewer's thoughts during the movie, which makes it all the more unintentionally hilarious. Enjoy.

newrepublic.com/article/143100/wonder-woman-propaganda

Shadar


It's like I got what she was saying, but I feel there was a river of assumed viewpoint that she just assumed I agreed with.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Jun 2017 20:15 #54699 by shadar

TwiceOnThursdays wrote:

shadar wrote: After hearing someone on Fox claiming that Wonder Woman sucked because she didn't have enough American stars on her costume, I decided to take a journey down the left-hand fork of Wingnut Highway to see if I could find a review that was also unintentionally funny on the other side.

I found a doozy. The Wonder Woman is Propaganda. review. Written by a millennial feminist woman who writes with great skill, it's a display of the kind of absurd distortions that come when you see everything through ideologically tinted glasses -- in this case, very thick ones. But it does rank high in my Unintentionally Funny rankings, so I've decided to share it.

I seriously doubt if ANYONE on SWM shared ANY of this reviewer's thoughts during the movie, which makes it all the more unintentionally hilarious. Enjoy.

newrepublic.com/article/143100/wonder-woman-propaganda

Shadar


It's like I got what she was saying, but I feel there was a river of assumed viewpoint that she just assumed I agreed with.


That river is called Ideology. But talk about overthinking the issue. WW's a comic book character. As in fantasy. And while music, school, movies, TV, books, everything shapes future generations, WW the Movie wasn't created to be the propaganda vehicle for children that this author claims.

Which is why the review is a hilarious addition to my Wingnut library. Although the author would surely hate me for saying that.

Kind of reminds me of an internet award I was nominated for (AU writing) about twenty years. Some kind of Unintentionally Funny award. I did not appreciate it at the time, but my award nomination was written in ways that this piece reminds me of.

People either need to ease up on the coffee or smoke more weed, whatever works for them. As I get older, I realize that fewer and fewer things have earth-shaking significance as the world spins in circles, repeating past mistakes with new enthusiasm. over and over. It's more fun to enjoy the ride than to take everything so seriously.

Shadar

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shadar
  • shadar's Avatar
  • Away
  • Uberposter par Excellence
  • Uberposter par Excellence
More
12 Jun 2017 21:35 #54704 by Markiehoe
Replied by Markiehoe on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
I am pretty sure that article was pre written and the movie scenes were spliced in later.
The author had an agenda and stuck with it.

The only movie she would have liked is the one where Diana killed the men on both sides.

Sort of like Gen. Ludendorf's plan.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Jun 2017 22:57 #54706 by shadar

Markiehoe wrote: I am pretty sure that article was pre written and the movie scenes were spliced in later.
The author had an agenda and stuck with it.

The only movie she would have liked is the one where Diana killed the men on both sides.

Sort of like Gen. Ludendorf's plan.



Agreed... her ideologically-tinted glasses were too dark for her to see through in any case.

She kept coming back to the "giantess" theme, which I frankly didn't get. Maybe the author is 4'10" and Gal was a giant in her eyes.

I've met a 5'11" supermodel wearing heels (Danielle Pestova!!) and she did look very tall and superhumanly attractive, but I was standing in a concert lobby in Singapore (Elton John concert) and her blonde head and mine were the only ones sticking above the short, raven-haired crowd. She had her back to a stone column like she was holding the building up. But any thought of her being a "giantess" was swamped by the humming of my own internal machinery, such as it was. I'd already used her image to illustrate a few stories by that time.

To the author's point about how the movie was propaganda for children, I can only hope so -- if it inclines them to want to see more superheroine "giantesses" on screen. Yes indeed.

Anyway, great fun to read a review from someone so far up Wingnut Alley that they can't even see the movie in front of them. Doesn't matter if they're politically left or right, wingnuts are my favorite form of comedic humor these days.

Shadar
The following user(s) said Thank You: Markiehoe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shadar
  • shadar's Avatar
  • Away
  • Uberposter par Excellence
  • Uberposter par Excellence
More
13 Jun 2017 14:52 #54727 by kikass2014
Replied by kikass2014 on topic WW - Spoiler Thread - Read if you want spoilers
^ AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Wait, let me say that again.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah I didn't make it to the end either LOL

Some ppl just need to get the *bleep* off the planet. They are taking up valuable air.

Peace.

/K
The following user(s) said Thank You: Markiehoe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jun 2017 16:56 #54775 by fats
Hi all,

I've deleted all posts that I feel is not keeping to the topic. I've never had to do this to this level but I needed to do this as the posts links where inflammatory and has no place here. I have no problems with people commenting on the film, but I have to draw it at line where people can and have been distressed by what is posted, this is the only reason why I intervened in this thread I got pm's and IM's expressing distress at the political nature of the posts, so I had to act.

Some people will be unhappy with what I did, believe me not as much as I am.

Please keep comments about the film and let's try to keep politics (especially politics of the era) out of the thread.

Fats
The following user(s) said Thank You: lfan, Woodclaw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • fats
  • fats's Avatar Topic Author
  • Away
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
14 Jun 2017 17:03 #54776 by Woodclaw

fats wrote: Hi all,

I've deleted all posts that I feel is not keeping to the topic. I've never had to do this to this level but I needed to do this as the posts links where inflammatory and has no place here. I have no problems with people commenting on the film, but I have to draw it at line where people can and have been distressed by what is posted, this is the only reason why I intervened in this thread I got pm's and IM's expressing distress at the political nature of the posts, so I had to act.

Some people will be unhappy with what I did, believe me not as much as I am.

Please keep comments about the film and let's try to keep politics (especially politics of the era) out of the thread.

Fats


I'd like to add one more thing: I know that it's difficult to keep politics out of the way because many of our choices and tastes are based on our political and social background, but this community is based on a shared interest and passion. This movie is seen by many as a political statement, but that's not what we as SWManiacs are looking for, so can we, please, concentrate on what we liked and we disliked on the movie itself, not it supposed "social value". Otherwise I think we are all due for a long golden lasso based re-education class ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jun 2017 17:48 #54779 by shadar
I have no problem with shutting things down, but there was no attempt to politicize SWM. This was based on showing examples of how wingnuts can take a fictional heroine and twist them to their own agenda.

I used to know someone who worked for the Southern Poverty Law Center, and his job was to dig out this wingnut stuff out of the dark net and expose it. He had to quit. It was too ugly.

But this was just a comic book movie. I was personally shocked by how far the wingnuts went on the normal Net.

I've always believed that if someone like WW ever actually appeared, then the public response would be extreme and varied, and much of it would not be appreciative and some would be violent. I think that is germane to our genre, and has been explored by several genre books. But the authors didn't go far enough. I now know that reality is worse.

Anyway, we don't need to prove this again. Those posts can happily disappear. Journeying into wingnut territory was a pretty scary ride.

Shadar

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shadar
  • shadar's Avatar
  • Away
  • Uberposter par Excellence
  • Uberposter par Excellence
More
20 Jun 2017 03:59 - 20 Jun 2017 05:49 #54893 by AuGoose
Replied by AuGoose on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.
I finally had a chance to take in a showing of Wonder Woman on the cheap day here at the local cinema.

Full disclosure: I like female superheroes. I do not like Wonder Woman. I find her badly constructed, badly used in the larger universe, and in most cases badly written. The creator and I were never going to be friends because I find his 'philosophy' essentially vile - thankfully every writer since has largely ignored it. She consistently draws DC's second string writers and it shows. While a few have used that as a launch pad to become well know and beloved storytellers, that's NOT why they were put on the book. Her rogues gallery is abysmal - to the point where you get an automatic geeky gold star if you can name more than three of her main, recurring villains. And heck, even I only know Silver Swan because of my own unique proclivities ;).

WARNING: ALL the spoilers ahead.

Ok, young Diana is adorable. Totally. And life on Themyscira was well framed. Loved the story book as framing device. The version of Themyscira I'm familiar with has them more technologically advanced than the world of Men in some respects and I thought the moving picture book was in keeping with my expectations for Paradise Island. Points awarded for NOT resorting to opening narration. Well done, Wonder Woman, you've already stomped that awful Green Lantern movie.

It did immediately trip my "Huh...?" reflex that Zeus died creating the island. A little itch that was eventually scratched "Then how was Diana born after they came to the island. Zeus is dead..."

I enjoyed every amazon's performance - to the point that I tend to think every one of them out-acted Gal Gadot. Some fabulous emoting and facial expressions there. Love me that non-verbal communication. Bonus points for Hippolyta not losing her shit when her most trusted second pretty much tells her "You're wrong" to her face. A truly strong ruler, that one.

Things move along and Captain Steve Trevor thwarts a few thousand years of perfect stealth with the power of his "above average" babe radar :). I thought the musical cues for pulling him to the surface and swimming off to shore with him were jarring and way over blown. Kicked me right out of watching the movie to seeing the director trying to herd the audience along. Star Wars Episode III was an example of that kind of musical horsewhipping. This thankfully was pretty brief.

We segue into what was probably the highlight of the movie for me: everybody but Gal Gadot fighting ;). Ok, she does get into it a little at the end. This was all kinds of combat choreography and I loved it. Culminating in the best character in the movie so far croaking, setting in motion dramatic destiny. Awesome. I'm totally on board. Lets do some Epic Drama!

More absolutely lovely scenery porn of the island. Fun with the lasso. Some touching introductions, a bit of Assassin's Creed with sledgehammers, and Hippolyta written as more than a sobbing mother. Refreshing. I could cheerfully do without another Wonder Woman movie, but man, I'd be there full-pop ticket in hand opening day for a DC Amazons movie :D. We come out of the first Act on track for amazing. Almost as good as the hype even. And in case anyone's forgotten, the first name on the screenplay is Zach Snyder.

Welcome to Act II and jolly old England. It's not for everybody. Etta Candy was a firecracker and a scene stealer, pretty much sealing the deal that every actress out-acted the Title Character... but then again, they're supposed to be more human I suppose. Or it could be I don't find arrogant,ignorant juveniles that compelling ;). I am going to echo some sentiments I've heard from others that this is about the most sanitized visit to World War One I've ever seen, almost as if they were shooting for a strict PG rating and not even PG 13. Stuffy old men (ha ha, no really, how could they not all be idiots in this movie?), seedy bar with disreputable heroes, a daring plan in defiance of the authorities. It's like I'm back in Rogue One :). Oh and a kindly patron who makes it all possible with a thick envelope full of cash. Because there's a wizard in every bar handing out quests, right? Right? Yes, it's textbook, but I thought it was charming and was fully entertained.

I will say the ice cream scene didn't work for me. It felt shoehorned in with stuttering, choppy timing. While I appreciate the nod to some of the better WW writing that has gone before, it felt like a check box rather than honest homage to me. ((shrug)) It worked for some people. So be it.

Act III: The War's This Way. Another nice scene around the campfire, bringing us up to speed on our curiously growing cast. More sterile war scenery. Ah, the trenches at last. Alright. Here it is. That big scene everyone tells me is so amazing... here it comes! I've had some time to get used to the idea that I'm not seeing the same movie as most people. For example, I honestly adore Suicide Squad and some of the most pitch-perfect emotional bonding amongst sociopaths I've ever seen on the big screen. I evidently don't look for the same things as a lot of people. I'm just gonna say it:

Meh.

I don't think I was any older than 10 when I worked out "blocking bullets with your bracelets is a stupid power." It entirely relies on your enemies being DUMBER THAN YOU ARE.

So, her triumphant march starts with... her shield on her back and her in a the weirdest, most inappropriately feminine strut in the whole movie. Slo-mo - naturally - in case you need more time eat that cheesecake. The scene literally exists to shout "Here's your chance, boys. Strip me naked with your eyes." Weird. And from there it feels like the writers basically know her bullet blocking powers are completely inadequate to the tasks of a 'modern' battlefield so they throw her in the deep end. I'm sorry, I don't believe a couple of German gunners with machine guns could keep their grouping inside the radius of that shield IF THEY TRIED TO. The first Act went out of its way to show us she bleeds when shot. Now, points for showing a few bullets sparking off her greaves, and she does eventually crouch down to finally obstruct the German's view of those sweet bare thighs. But this is pretty much the exact scenario where Wonder Woman's hubris should net her a harsh lesson in picking your battles instead of her free pass to glory. It's like the writers wanted to rub my nose in it.

From there we move onto block-to-block fight with a little more tooth and substance. I liked pretty much every shot, although the slo-mo mimicry of 300 did not enhance my experience. I did find myself thinking "Hell yeah I'll play this videogame when it comes out." That tank toss was satisfying but strangely underplayed. That lasso work screamed "mash the triangle button three times" to me :D. All the effort in act I to build a Amazonian kinesthetic combat vocabulary really paid off here. Culminating in Captain Trevor calling out "Shield!" Like he was paying attention or something.

Victory. Carousing. WW gets some. ...And at that point you know Steve Trevor's pretty much a deader. Because at the meta-plot level there's just zero chance Wonder Woman's going to be presented in any way that keeps the nerd community from thinking of her as an ideal waifu. Honestly that's my biggest gripe with setting it in World War One: they went out of their way to make she doesn't build a supporting cast in the present day. Certainly not any romantic entanglements. I find this handing of the character... cowardly.

Act IV This Rollercoaster Only Goes Down. From little jagged edges in the cutting, I have to think this part must have had some epic combat going on... in the editing room. There's a scene with Steve staring at a servant setting out chairs for a outdoor viewing. Chekov's Gun says there was another scene there. But it's gone in the final cut. I also don't even get Steve's thick German accent... we haven't had to be pelted with that from the actual Germans speaking German up to that point. We're also given another chance to see that Elena Anaya is criminally underused in this movie (and securing the shutout for WW's female cast vs. the lead ;)).

Horrors ensue. We get a short, not terribly impressive fight, darkness falls so the CG animators don't have to work so hard. Faith is tested. A sword driven completely through a man is mysteriously completely free of dripping blood. Ares appears... Hi old Brit tavern wizard!

WTF.

Ok, I'd been spoilered, so maybe this was more surprising for some, but again: WTF. Absolutely NOTHING is gained from tying these two characters together. Its the kind of pointless literary cleverness that isn't clever at all. The actor was fine as the Brit but he was absolutely silly as the God of War. He looked preposterous in the broken armor after getting smote by Zeus. People complain about the CGFX at this point - I tend to think its preferable to having to look at his face :).

I actually liked Ares' power set: the telekinesis along with assembling crude armor, jagged swords, spiked chains and wicked javelins from the detritus of war feels pretty visually coherent and fitting to the character. The actor won't shut up, but I'm trying to tune him out with the explosions anyway.

Battle-battle. Menace-menace. Explosions! Ooo, our protagonist is in trouble! The music swells....

Then they fucking Whedon Formula their way out.



Sorry, this trope is already tired. Put it to bed. With an axe between the eyes. You're not actually saying anything good about women's power with this crap.

Battle-battle. Easy win now that I have the Power of Love. Touching moments. Return to the present. Pave the way for the next movie. All the blockbuster boxes checked off and overall a good time was had.

Then a final "I don't know what the hell that was" visual flourish as she leaps into the air over Paris. Maybe it's supposed to be her finally returning to armored/costumed presence? Because I think she's been a ghost for nearly 100 years.

Had fun. Will likely buy on disk. Will favorably recommend to friends, while urging modest expectations. Entirely ready to watch Marvel Studios kick its ass with Captain Marvel.

And sign me up for a DCMU Amazons movie. That, I want to see! :)

This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.

Last edit: 20 Jun 2017 05:49 by AuGoose.
The following user(s) said Thank You: fats, kikass2014, LustMonster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 05:01 #54894 by d_k_c
Replied by d_k_c on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.
Blasphemy! Say 10 our Fathers, 1000 Hail Mary's and all shall be forgiven
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sarge395, AuGoose, LustMonster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 05:34 #54895 by LustMonster
Replied by LustMonster on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.

d_k_c wrote: Blasphemy! Say 10 our Fathers, 1000 Hail Mary's and all shall be forgiven


I've got this image in my head now of an ubergirl sitting in a confessional, grinning wickedly as she confesses to the crunchy smashy fun she just had...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 08:50 #54896 by TwiceOnThursdays
Replied by TwiceOnThursdays on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.

AuGoose wrote: I finally had a chance to take in a showing of Wonder Woman on the cheap day here at the local cinema.

Full disclosure: I like female superheroes. I do not like Wonder Woman. I find her badly constructed, badly used in the larger universe, and in most cases badly written. The creator and I were never going to be friends because I find his 'philosophy' essentially vile - thankfully every writer since has largely ignored it. She consistently draws DC's second string writers and it shows. While a few have used that as a launch pad to become well know and beloved storytellers, that's NOT why they were put on the book. Her rogues gallery is abysmal - to the point where you get an automatic geeky gold star if you can name more than three of her main, recurring villains. And heck, even I only know Silver Swan because of my own unique proclivities ;).


Cheetah? Circe? Dr. Psycho? (Second String; giganta) Misc Olympian Gods (Ares, etc). I get a geeky gold star? Admittedly it's not that great of a Rouges Gallery, but it's not like there isn't one. I'd agrue that Cheetah and Circe are first class (as are the Olympian Gods if used right)

I think we'll disagree on the writers Post-Perez. Perez wasn't known as a writer when he asked for WW, so you're right about him (though he asked for the job). But Gail Simone, Phil Jimenez, JMS, John Byrne, and Greg Rucka were. (Admittedly this was Gail right before Birds of Prey, but she'd still written for some major books before WW and she DID want the job). That's a large hunk of Wonder Woman post-perez done by skilled writers who wanted to be on the book. I totally agree with what you said BEFORE Perez. (Just heard James Robinson is going to write the book now. Also, we should keep Grant Morrison FAR AWAY from Wonder Woman.)

AuGoose wrote:
So, her triumphant march starts with... her shield on her back and her in a the weirdest, most inappropriately feminine strut in the whole movie. Slo-mo - naturally - in case you need more time eat that cheesecake. The scene literally exists to shout "Here's your chance, boys. Strip me naked with your eyes." Weird. And from there it feels like the writers basically know her bullet blocking powers are completely inadequate to the tasks of a 'modern' battlefield so they throw her in the deep end. I'm sorry, I don't believe a couple of German gunners with machine guns could keep their grouping inside the radius of that shield IF THEY TRIED TO. The first Act went out of its way to show us she bleeds when shot. Now, points for showing a few bullets sparking off her greaves, and she does eventually crouch down to finally obstruct the German's view of those sweet bare thighs. But this is pretty much the exact scenario where Wonder Woman's hubris should net her a harsh lesson in picking your battles instead of her free pass to glory. It's like the writers wanted to rub my nose in it.

From there we move onto block-to-block fight with a little more tooth and substance. I liked pretty much every shot, although the slo-mo mimicry of 300 did not enhance my experience. I did find myself thinking "Hell yeah I'll play this videogame when it comes out." That tank toss was satisfying but strangely underplayed. That lasso work screamed "mash the triangle button three times" to me :D. All the effort in act I to build a Amazonian kinesthetic combat vocabulary really paid off here. Culminating in Captain Trevor calling out "Shield!" Like he was paying attention or something.


I take the entire thing as one sequence, it's not just going over the top until she hits the trench, it's the ENTIRE battle til the sniper tower at the end. I didn't spend too much time critiquing the beginning. I do think you weren't served by reading/hearing about this beforehand. You hyperfocused on the first part, and found it ... not super-amazing-wonderful, which is how it was billed to you so you find it overall, meh. (This is why I try to see movies the first night.)

I do think that a bit more on her being pinned down and it being a bad spot would have been good, and then having the save from Trevor's team as a bigger thing. Maybe she gets winged by a bullet or something. Im ean they DO save her ass in the movie, but I don't think the movie really spelled that out too much. A bit more highlighting that it was a really brash move would have been a good point (she's not perfect).

AuGoose wrote:
Horrors ensue. We get a short, not terribly impressive fight, darkness falls so the CG animators don't have to work so hard. Faith is tested. A sword driven completely through a man is mysteriously completely free of dripping blood. Ares appears... Hi old Brit tavern wizard!

WTF.

Ok, I'd been spoilered, so maybe this was more surprising for some, but again: WTF. Absolutely NOTHING is gained from tying these two characters together. Its the kind of pointless literary cleverness that isn't clever at all. The actor was fine as the Brit but he was absolutely silly as the God of War. He looked preposterous in the broken armor after getting smote by Zeus. People complain about the CGFX at this point - I tend to think its preferable to having to look at his face :).


Maybe being spoilered didn't help you?

I pegged him as Ares from the beginning (I had some side money out on him maybe just being a pawn). It seemed pretty well established and telegraphed. I never saw "wizard funding mission" I saw "bad guy maniuplating events" down to him letting them use his office. I didn't go in having this given to me, but I picked it out of the flow of the movie, so when it happened it was confirmation that I was noticing what was going on. Was this a surprise to anyone?

I thought he was GREAT as Ares ... up until the moment he begame God-Ares in flash backs and the fight. Then it looked silly. They should have changed his face (and probably his voice). After all his father impregnated women as a swan! Certainly Ares can look/sound like someone else? In the comics you don't often see Ares face (just his eyes), they probably should have went with that. And either heavily modulated the actors voice OR gotten a new voice actor.

AuGoose wrote: Then they fucking Whedon Formula their way out.

Attachment not found



Sorry, this trope is already tired. Put it to bed. With an axe between the eyes. You're not actually saying anything good about women's power with this reverse "euthanized damsel" crap.


(Sorry this set me off, mostly because the example of River, I re-read this and it's half rant, but, meh, I'm going to let it stand, I'll just apologize for being over the top.)

The general trope of "kill the significant other/parents to movitvate the hero" is ancient. This is also a generic action movie trope too. Hell, it's even in John Wick (they use a Dog instead.) I think singling it out in female hero movies like it's something that only happens there is pretty lame. But we're in agreement that writers should stay far away from the trope.

I'd also argue that Trevor's death has a different tone, it wasn't the bad guy killing him, an accident, imposed on him, or spur of the moment heroism, it was a plan to solve a problem that he didn't have time to find another solution (he wouldn't risk the plane crashing and kiling even German civilians). In other words, unlike most dead-loved-ones, Trevor chose his death, and it served a purpose to him other than just motivating WW (even though it did that).

Also whoever made that meme needs to watch Serenity again. River's rampage didn't have anything directlly to do with Wash's death. She sat through the initial firefight after Wash's death huddled in the corner.

She went on her rampage to save her friends who were all going to die. Kaylee and Simon were going to die w/o access to Simon's med-pack. If the door wasn't closed (from the enemy side), they'd be overrun and Zoe and Jayne would die too. She then decided that she would protect Simon, instead of Simon protecting her. She went on a rampage to ensure her LIVING friends (family) STAYED THAT WAY. If the meme used Simon it'd have been closer (he'd just been shot), but still wrong. She only started moving and overcame the psychic noise in her head from the reavers when she realized she could SAVE everyone (and only she could do it). NOT just by people dying/getting hurt, though that of course did spur the need for saving... in any event, she's NOT motivated by "a dead male".

There are a lot of counter examples like that too, the meme was just bad enough to provide an excellent one where it's dead wrong. There are plenty of women kicking ass w/o a man dying. (Black Widow, Resident Evil, Underworld (has a bit of that too though), Dark Phoenix, etc)

I'm not saying "dead person motivation" isn't used in female action movies. I just don't think it's overused compared it it's use in male action movies. Let's review the male movie super-heroes that fit: (threat of death/death spurs a fight/determination/rampage) Batman (Dark Knight, BvS), Superman (1978, BvS), Spider-Man (Gwen), Iron Man (civil War, parents, hell he's not on a rampage, he's unhinged), Black Panther (civil war), Thor (mother killed), The Losers (DC Vertigo movie), the Kingsman, Sin City.... (etc)

The trope IS over-used. I'm just taking issue with both the image (i.e. River) and the implication that it's just over-used in female super-hero movies.

AuGoose wrote: Had fun. Will likely buy on disk. Will favorably recommend to friends, while urging modest expectations. Entirely ready to watch Marvel Studios kick its ass with Captain Marvel.

And sign me up for a DCMU Amazons movie. That, I want to see! :)


Oh, fuck yeah. An Amazons movie woudl be great. I think they feature in a giant battle in Justice League. But frankly if it's a CGI fest like the end fight in WW, MoS and BvS, it won't be the same.

I am trained to trust/like Marvel movies so I suspect I'll think Captain Marvel is fantastic ...but I'm also cautious and trying to not think about it as a done deal. Marvel isn't perfect either. I walk out of a few of them having really enjoyed myself, but with a bit of "meh". Like GotG 2. I had TONS of fun, but it's not like I didn't see most of the jokes, plot points coming from a Loooooong Way away. Ride was still hella fun.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 12:57 - 20 Jun 2017 13:22 #54898 by AuGoose
Replied by AuGoose on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.
You undoubtedly get a geeky gold star for Doctor Psycho :).

Yes, her own permanent series has seen some talent try to come in and tidy up the place. Personally I liked the JMS reboot aside from a few iffy costuming choices. It gave us the first really modern WW villain in ages before the whole attempt was boo'd off the stage. We got a Blackwater-style torturer-for-hire burned alive by Amazons and seemingly plucked back from the edge of death by Ares. That dude was alarming!

I really don't take "no man'd land" to include "and the village beyond it." Its a totally different tempo and shifts from one man band to ensemble. It also stops relying on "could the 50 of you all keep shooting me in the one place I can't be hurt? Thanks!"

The Ares spoiler didn't matter. From the movie viewer perspective the German general was never a plausible candidate to be Ares (though he does go off on his deific tirade at the party pretty much specifically to keep Diana off in the underbrush). That left a suspect pool of pretty much one, with plenty of bits with him being oddly twitchy.

If they'd killed her dog, I wouldn't have made the comparison. If they'd killed a kid, I wouldn't have made the comparison. If Whedon's gonna keep going back to the well of kill a guy in the third reel then have a female character go on a rampage I'M GONNA MAKE THE COMPARISON. It's not even motivation for the female character - its just shock the audience "oooo, the stakes are real". Its a structure. A Formula. When Zach and Joss are good buddies, and Zach wrote this, I'm gonna say its going to the same well. Its getting monotonous.

But maybe I'm missing some examples of this evidently time honored tradition with male heroes. What did you have in mind for "a main character dies in the final reel and then a protagonist goes on a rampage"?
Last edit: 20 Jun 2017 13:22 by AuGoose.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 13:25 #54899 by Markiehoe
Replied by Markiehoe on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.
Wonder Woman is a good movie because it follows the rules.
There is nothing new here under the Sun.

Joe Cambell wrote it all down years ago.
Fill in the blanks as you go along.

1. THE ORDINARY WORLD. The hero, uneasy, uncomfortable or unaware, is introduced sympathetically so the audience can identify with the situation or dilemma. The hero is shown against a background of environment, heredity, and personal history. Some kind of polarity in the hero’s life is pulling in different directions and causing stress.

2. THE CALL TO ADVENTURE. Something shakes up the situation, either from external pressures or from something rising up from deep within, so the hero must face the beginnings of change.

3. REFUSAL OF THE CALL. The hero feels the fear of the unknown and tries to turn away from the adventure, however briefly. Alternately, another character may express the uncertainty and danger ahead.

4. MEETING WITH THE MENTOR. The hero comes across a seasoned traveler of the worlds who gives him or her training, equipment, or advice that will help on the journey. Or the hero reaches within to a source of courage and wisdom.

5. CROSSING THE THRESHOLD. At the end of Act One, the hero commits to leaving the Ordinary World and entering a new region or condition with unfamiliar rules and values.

6. TESTS, ALLIES AND ENEMIES. The hero is tested and sorts out allegiances in the Special World.

7. APPROACH. The hero and newfound allies prepare for the major challenge in the Special world.

8. THE ORDEAL. Near the middle of the story, the hero enters a central space in the Special World and confronts death or faces his or her greatest fear. Out of the moment of death comes a new life.

9. THE REWARD. The hero takes possession of the treasure won by facing death. There may be celebration, but there is also danger of losing the treasure again.

10. THE ROAD BACK. About three-fourths of the way through the story, the hero is driven to complete the adventure, leaving the Special World to be sure the treasure is brought home. Often a chase scene signals the urgency and danger of the mission.

11. THE RESURRECTION. At the climax, the hero is severely tested once more on the threshold of home. He or she is purified by a last sacrifice, another moment of death and rebirth, but on a higher and more complete level. By the hero’s action, the polarities that were in conflict at the beginning are finally resolved.

12. RETURN WITH THE ELIXIR. The hero returns home or continues the journey, bearing some element of the treasure that has the power to transform the world as the hero has been transformed.
The following user(s) said Thank You: AuGoose

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 13:32 #54900 by AuGoose
Replied by AuGoose on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.
Ah, reductionism at it's finest. The Heroic Journey - the story that wishes it was all stories-- but isn't. Thankfully.

Which is pretty much why Warcraft fumbled at the box office... and why I loved it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jun 2017 14:02 #54902 by Woodclaw
Replied by Woodclaw on topic So, I've now seen Wonder Woman.

AuGoose wrote: Yes, her own permanent series has seen some talent try to come in and tidy up the place. Personally I liked the JMS reboot aside from a few iffy costuming choices. It gave us the first really modern WW villain in ages before the whole attempt was boo'd off the stage. We got a Blackwater-style torturer-for-hire burned alive by Amazons and seemingly plucked back from the edge of death by Ares. That dude was alarming!


I think that you're both right in the sense that Ww comic book tend to swing very wildly depending on the time of the year. While this can be said of pretty much every title under the sun, I believe it's particolary noticeable with her because she's supposed to be a big deal, but very few writers seem to get the character right.

AuGoose wrote: I really don't take "no man'd land" to include "and the village beyond it." Its a totally different tempo and shifts from one man band to ensemble. It also stops relying on "could the 50 of you all keep shooting me in the one place I can't be hurt? Thanks!"


I think that the big problem is that the biggest problem with the crossing of no man's land was the pace of the scene: it looked like a weird mixture of slow-motion elements and high speed bullets that ended up giving the impression of a drawn out moment whereas it should have been a comparatively quick paced scene to work out. From the "realism" POV, Augoose has some valid points: even if Diana was working so that everyone concentrated fire on her, it's kind of ridicolous that no bullet was ever aimed below her waist (granted shooting at the belly is often the most effective choice because it's one of the less mobile parts of the human body). Still, I think that as a power show it worked and I appreciated that it wasn't completely self-serving.

AuGoose wrote: The Ares spoiler didn't matter. From the movie viewer perspective the German general was never a plausible candidate to be Ares (though he does go off on his deific tirade at the party pretty much specifically to keep Diana off in the underbrush). That left a suspect pool of pretty much one, with plenty of bits with him being oddly twitchy.


I keep thinking that the big error was to make Ares a singular character with a defined human identity. Playing him as a creepy mastermind -- while untrue to the mythological roots, which mattered zero here -- would have been more effective because it would have pushed the conflict on a different level. If Ares is the incarnation of war, of that part of the human mind that is eager to go out and kill everything that moves, what does this make Wonder Woman?

AuGoose wrote: If they'd killed her dog, I wouldn't have made the comparison. If they'd killed a kid, I wouldn't have made the comparison. If Whedon's gonna keep going back to the well of kill a guy in the third reel then have a female character go on a rampage I'M GONNA MAKE THE COMPARISON. It's not even motivation for the female character - its just shock the audience "oooo, the stakes are real". Its a structure. A Formula. When Zach and Joss are good buddies, and Zach wrote this, I'm gonna say its going to the same well. Its getting monotonous.

But maybe I'm missing some examples of this evidently time honored tradition with male heroes. What did you have in mind for "a main character dies in the final reel and then a protagonist goes on a rampage"?


On this one I side with Twice on one thing: Steve Trevor choose to die here, it wasn't a random death that triggered that final Whedon style asskicking moment, but a deliberate choice. I'm going to call the movie out on one thing: was it really necessary? The entire assumption of the scene was that being hydrogen based the gas would burn damn fast and leave very little behind. If this was true and a single bullet was enough to start the fire would have been so difficult for Steve and his team to lob in a handful of grenades and get the hell out? Especially considering that there were plenty of dead soldiers around? I know this is firdge logic, but I can totally see the scene ending the same way just with Steve getting hit by the blast and dying all the same, but out of bad luck as a casualty of war, an unwilling sacrifice to Ares, not as a guy who put his ass on the line in a stunt that was as likely not to work.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.092 seconds